MUST WOMEN TURN UGLY TO PROVE TO BE VIRTUOUS?

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THOSE WHO CONSIDER MEN AND WOMEN ROMANTICISING EACH OTEHR AS EITHER A SIN OR A SIGN OF SOME CHAUVINISM .TO ME, A MAN WHO DENIES BEING MOVED BY A WOMAN'S BEAUTY AND A WOMAN WHO SAYS THAT SHE IS BLIND TO A MAN'S MASCULINE DIGNITY DESERVE OUR SYMPATHIES BECAUSE NATURE DEPRIVED THEM OF A SENSIBILITY SO ESSENTIAL TO AESTHETIC GRACE. MUST A MAN AND A WOMAN BE BLIND TO HEADY ROMANCE OF BEING A MAN AND WOMAN IN ORDER TO HAVE THEIR OTHER VIRTUES AND MERTIS RECOGNISED? MUST A WOMAN OBLIGINGLY TURN UGLY TO PROVE HER MERITS IN OTHER SPHERES? MUST HER GOOD LOOKS BE HELD AGAINST HER? IF MOTHER THERESA HAD ALSO BEEN A PRETTY WOMAN (TAKSIR MUAAF, THE GREAT LADY WAS NOT), WOULD THERE BE ANY SIN IN ACKNOWLEDGING THAT FACT. GURU GOBIND SINGH WAS AMONG THE HANDSOMEST OF MEN, AND IS RIGHTLY ADMIRED FOR THAT ALONGWITH HIS OTHER VIRTUES. ANY PROBLEM THERE? THE WHOLE POINT IS THAT IT IS NOT ROMANCE "or" VIRTUE BUT ROMANCE "and" VIRTUE. DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND? TAKE MY OFFER FOR A FREE CHECK UP AT THE NEAREST PSYCHITRIC CLINIC. !!:))