Friday, June 22, 2012

When you speak, you touch but one of millions of layers of truth

"Whenever you say something, you address but one of the million layers of truth. Because you did not and can not touch all layers at one stroke, it does not follow that what you spoke was wrong; it only means that it was true in a limited way. For the matter of that, everything spoken can be true only in a limited way. Whenever you touch something, you leave a lot else untouched. You can not touch the whole universe at one stroke. But you can know the whole universe at one go. And the way to do that is so simple. It is called love.

And love? Love at first sight is the only love that is possible. You can never know anything without first being in love with it. The belief that you need to know something well before loving it is so grossly misleading; knowledge is impossible without love. If you want to know something – from your child to God – fall in love first. There is no better example of this than a mother. No one knows you better than your mother does, but that’s because she hadn’t bothered to know you before deciding to love you. In her case , it is love even before first sight. You will never a better form of love on this earth. ”

ਰੇ ਮਨ ਐਸੋ ਕਰਿ ਸੰਨਿਆਸਾ II...A note in response to Rajiv query




Shabad
ਸ਼ਬਦ  ..੧ ਓਂਕਾਰ  ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ II
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫਤਿਹ II
ਰਾਗ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ  ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹੀ ੧੦ II 

ਰੇ ਮਨ  ਐਸੋ ਕਰਿ ਸੰਨਿਆਸਾ II
ਬਨ ਸੇ ਸਦਨ  ਸਬੈ ਕਰ ਸਮਝਹੁ  ਮਨ ਹੀ ਮਾਹਿ ਉਦਾਸਾ II II ਰਹਾਉ  II
ਜਤ ਕੀ ਜਟਾ ਜੋਗ  ਕੋ ਮਜਨੁ  ਨੇਮ ਕੇ ਨਖੁਨ ਬਢਾਓ II  
ਗਿਆਨ ਗੁਰੂ ਆਤਮ ਉਪਦੇਸਹੁ ਨਾਮ ਬਿਭੂਤ ਲਗਾਓ II II
ਅਲਪ ਅਹਾਰ ਸੁਲਪ ਸੀ ਨਿੰਦਰਾ ਦਯਾ ਛਿਮਾ ਤਨ ਤਨ ਪ੍ਰੀਤਿ  II
ਸੀਲ ਸੰਤੋਖ ਸਦਾ ਨਿਰਬਾਹਿਬੋ  ਹ੍ਵੈਬੋ ਤ੍ਰਿਗੁਣ ਅਤੀਤ II II੨  II
ਕਾਮ ਕ੍ਰੋਧ  ਹੰਕਾਰ ਲੋਭ ਹਠ ਮੋਹ ਨ ਮਨ ਮੋ ਲਯਾਵੈ 
ਤਬ ਹੀ ਆਤਮ ਤਤ ਕੋ ਦਰਸੈ ਪਰਮ ਪੁਰਖ ਕਹ ਪਾਵੈ II3  II ਇਈ
ਸ਼ਬਦ ਹਜਾਰੇ - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ  ਸਾਹਿਬ 


ਰੇ ਮਨ 
Re man in Gur-bani is not so much an exhortation to self or soul or mind as a prayer to the cosmic spirit which resonates within and without us  and is thus an evidence of omnipresence not only of an external force but of our own  consciousness -- in a cosmic spread. ( Thus, the prayer, the one who prays and the one to whom the prayer is addressed are overlapping and are in fact shifting patterns in the same kaleidoscope .)

Thus,  "Re Man" is an outcry of the cosmic self` or cosmic energy ( also called God- param atama- cosmic energy  in the throes of self-conflict, which in fact is a self-play ( Leela??), a  self-delusion of consciousness, spirit, mind, God, energy or whatever name you want to give it. The problem as you know better than any of us, Rajiv, is one of language here – language   which is a tool of the rational mind, and rational mind being just the outer tip of consciousness can hardly grasp or express the whole truth of the ocean that spreads behind it.( And I am already into preaching to a Prophet !!)

"Re man" is also one half of the mind addressing the other.

ਰੇ ਮਨ  ਐਸੋ ਕਰਿ ਸੰਨਿਆਸਾ II
"Sanyasa" of course you know. I only need to emphasize that san+nias also means " residing everywhere", seemingly quite the opposite of what it normally expresses.
Reach a state of such sanyaas .....

ਬਨ ਸੇ ਸਦਨ  ਸਬੈ ਕਰ ਸਮਝਹੁ  ਮਨ ਹੀ ਮਾਹਿ ਉਦਾਸਾ II II ਰਹਾਉ  II
ban= of course a forest and sadan = of course a house/ home...Regard all homes as forest ( home in Gurbani is also a symbol of soul, self, mind, consciousness within-- Ghar hi parcha paiyeeye....find knowledge at home only).Interestingly, the Guru does not say, “Regard the forest as your home” but “Regard your home as forest”. Here, the Guru refers to the belief that mental detachment is possible only through sanayasa or retiring to the forests...but the Guru is obviously not  being critical of this; he is going beyond that and is in fact endorsing the importance of sanyasa, but is suggesting that for this, one's own home can attain the status of a forest; its about state of mind . The chief difference between a forest and home is not  "desolation" ( which in any case a forest never represents); the chief difference is that one regards a home as one's own, and thus a possession,  whereas a forest is  belongs to everyone or to no one in particular, and certainly not to "me". The Guru appears to suggest that residing in your home but by regarding it as not your own but a place that belongs to everyone or to the universe itself, you can free yourself of the pangs of attachment --"this house is not mine; I merely reside here" , this world does not belong to me; I merely reside here" --But by surrendering everything you gain everything; so you can see that since  nothing belongs to you,  by the same logic nothing belongs to anyone else either. Therefore, everything here is yours through love. And through love alone does anything become yours; but then it belongs to anyone or everyone who loves it, and that takes nothing away from the place or from your rights over it. Everything is infinitely sharable because everything is infinitely lovable . That which you possess does not belong to you. You merely possess it, as an invader might possess your land or country, but it will never belong to him. It will belong to you , even if you don't possess an inch of it. It will belong to you simply because  you love it. Desire is about possessing; love is about belonging. Thus the Guru extends the space of home to the infiniteness of a forest. And  the other meaning of san-nias , residing everywhere, also comes into play.

Thus sanyas no longer remains an act of  painful giving up; it actually transforms into a door to "Anand" since you have expanded the bounds of your home to those of a forest...actualy the bounds of your mind !! Thus,  ਮਨ ਹੀ ਮਾਹਿ ਉਦਾਸਾ ...Now, udasa is another interesting word here, Rajiv, as you already know all its connotations. And surely it has nothing to do with udasi or even udaseenata... It refers to a state of mind akin to "bairaag" -- another exceedingly fascinating phenomenon which runs close on the bounds of Anand  ( Which is untranslatable) I would like to sit quiet one day and listen to you on Bairaag.

ਜਤ ਕੀ ਜਟਾ ਜੋਗ  ਕੋ ਮਜਨੁ  ਨੇਮ ਕੇ ਨਖੁਨ ਬਢਾਓ II 

(ਜਤ ) of course refers to stern discipline of mind ; For the Jog Mat, the Jata, or long hair, among other things, symbolised penance also, It also referred to external discipline though as a symbol of internal penance.. The Guru obviously moves the journey  completely inwards....and says cleansing of the mind alone is purification (ਜੋਗ  ਕੋ ਮਜਨੁ ). The followers of the Jog Mat, as you know, used  to grow long nails. The Guru brings up a concept so crucial to Gurbani -    nem or niyam which to me symbolise the divine laws but is commonly taken to mean "rules" . I go for "kudrat de nem" --- Laws of Nature . Acceptance of these laws alone is highest discipline and highest bliss. For  me Rajiv,  words 'nem" and "hukam" hold fascinating and infinite meanings. Contrary to a tin-pot dictator's diktat, hukam appears to me to be the ultimate embodiment of reality -- hukam, Order, Laws, Niyam, Nem -- they all  seem to refer to forces and principles  that govern the universe or life. These are immutable and hence supreme; fighting against them or nurturing wishes or desires that run contrary to them can only lead to a conflict with truth and therefore to pain, agony, sorrow. The greatest and the most obvious  nem or hukam or law of the universe or of Nature ( Kudrat/fitrat)
is "change" ( refers also to dynamism of reality). Everything is subject to change, said Buddha, and Vedas and Gurbani clearly agree. Thus birth and death too are merely  parts of the same natural nem/hukam/laws/principles. There is neither good not bad in either of these. But to rise that level – well, well, well !!  In Gurbani there is another name used for this: Bhaana or the Will. To me at least, Bhaana and Hukam and nem and Laws of Universe ( Laws of Physics also)  are the same thing.
     The problem of language arises  here again. We seem to conclude that if there is bhaana, then there must be one whose bhaana it is; will seems to presupposes the one who wills ( God)  and hukam seems to presuppose a haakam ( also, mohkam, hakuoomat etc) These contradictions can never be resolved for these are contradictions created by a rational tool called language. To me, briefly, hukam or Will or God or  nem and  bhaana -- all refer to the same thing and speak of the same truth—that  Universe and its Laws are the same thing.( You can call it God and His Will, if you please)  The universe is nothing but a set of laws in operation; so is God -- another name for expressing the same reality. 

ਗਿਆਨ ਗੁਰੂ ਆਤਮ ਉਪਦੇਸਹੁ ਨਾਮ ਬਿਭੂਤ ਲਗਾਓ II II

Gian-- enlightenment - alone is Guru . The other two words can mean either that this enlightenment addresses or teaches "Atm" , self, you etc, or that Atm itself is the updesh incarnate. I am not sure which is closer to the Guru's meaning. Will consult someone and get back. 

And the following three words present the greatest difficulty. ਨਾਮ ਬਿਭੂਤ ਲਗਾਓ II II

  All my life, Rajiv,  I have privately struggled to find out what ਨਾਮ  refers to. Surely, it is not name;  or if it is, surely it is not in the sense of nomenclature So what is it?.. a cosmic sound like OM ?? Or is it the unheard melody of cosmic love anhad naad or what is it??.. I am completely at a loss here.. i am soon going to a saint whose wisdom i trust . I wish to sit at his feet and try to understand what this refers to . Its not as easy as that -- that I will go and in one month, I will get to understand. Wish self realisation or revelation of  truth was that easy. But I am going to make an attempt,  sitting at his feet, loving, serving everything  and everyone  and trying to see if I can get anywhere close to this. If I do, you might find me dancing in the streets.....you will find out whether or not I have found out , although then it might cease to matter one way or the other..
I am leaving these words completely untouched for this reason. ( Not that I understand much of what I have written about other things !!!)

But you are going to love the followng line ( as you do the rest of it , of course) ..ਅਲਪ ਅਹਾਰ ਸੁਲਪ ਸੀ ਨਿੰਦਰਾ ਦਯਾ ਛਿਮਾ ਤਨ ਤਨ ਪ੍ਰੀਤਿ  II

alap ahaar of course does not simply mean "eat less" but has a larger context -- May be, consume less, the door to peace and bliss in any case. ( It is , as you already know, not just about eating less; its about ahar.. which is subsistence and everything that you need for it.)

But the next two words are fascinatingly poetic --ਸੁਲਪ ਸੀ ਨਿੰਦਰਾ  -- sleep as brief and as aware (as that of a snake !!) To be awake  and  alert ( chetan)  or aware of truth even in sleep ( mundane , day to day life)  is the distinguishing mark of an Enlightened One ( Buddha, Jogi, Giani, Guru, Braham-in)

And I simply love and adore the following words: ਦਯਾ ਛਿਮਾ ਤਨ ਤਨ ਪ੍ਰੀਤਿ…compassion, (sym—pathy, feeling exactly one with someone), forgiveness ( the highest virtue in Sikh thought) and love that can not be held back, love that overflows …
Plus,  ਸੀਲ ਸੰਤੋਖ ਸਦਾ ਨਿਰਬਾਹਿਬੋ  ਹ੍ਵੈਬੋ ਤ੍ਰਿਗੁਣ ਅਤੀਤ – gentle, pious, (ਸਾਊ, ਸ਼ਰੀਫ਼ ਹੋਣ ਦਾ ਗੁਣ)  , the contentment ( in the sense of accepting reality with quiet and dignified poise – not a lazy acquiescence but a dynamic exercise of will to refuse misery over failure to feed greed , is what ਸੰਤੋਖ  is. Stay with these virtues and then you might transcend the three legendary gunas , including sadgun)

ਕਾਮ ਕ੍ਰੋਧ  ਹੰਕਾਰ ਲੋਭ ਹਠ ਮੋਹ ਨ ਮਨ ਮੋ ਲਯਾਵੈ 
ਤਬ ਹੀ ਆਤਮ ਤਤ ਕੋ ਦਰਸੈ ਪਰਮ ਪੁਰਖ ਕਹ ਪਾਵੈ II3  II

Hatth here of course means a mixture of stubborn greed and vanity. If you transcend these snakes,  ਕਾਮ ਕ੍ਰੋਧ  ਹੰਕਾਰ ਲੋਭ ਹਠ ਮੋਹ  , then alone will self ( soul, mind) have a vision of truth, and then alone will he rise to the level of param purakh)


As you can see, my focus is tiring towards the end. ( Spill over of a long day at work –Vidhan Sabha Session. ( I am not in job, but I am still in love. We will discuss later. Or does it matter??)

I will come back some other time on these two most beautiful last lines. For the moment, I will be hoping this answers your query at least to some minor extent, Rajiv.

Finally, I am not befooled into believing that I am writing all this to help you understand anything better than you already do. Knowing how far ahead of me you already stand, I will never be found guilty of that blasphemy. Let it be said I enjoy talking to you, and hence these rambling thoughts)

AND ONE MORE THING, RAJIV. I am indebted to  a younger but friend here for his extremely valuable inputs into this note – a young man of exquisite sensibility, intelligence AND, above all,  humility. His name is GURDARSHAN SINGH BAHIA.  I must acknowledge his help here.)


 





“I am a priest of love. Give it to me in any garb, anywhere, any time. I will take it. “ “I am a priest of love. Give it to me in any garb, anywhere, any time. I will take it. “


“I am a priest of love. Give it to me in any garb, anywhere, any time. I will take it. “


Love is roots, not leaves and branches.



Giving comes naturally to love...In fact, to be in love is to want to give. But that's only the beginning ..(Quite another thing that this 'giving' is often confused with piling up claims and seeking reclamation -- most people give for a reason and call it love. That is a DEAL, not love. ( Love as a DEAL is a more popular form of love, and sometimes it translates into what we commonly call 'marriage' . ( On other occasions, it is simply 'relationship', 'friendship' or whatever other misleading name you can come by.)

I am often amused at the glorification of marriage by people who in the end settle for calling it " mutual adjustment - which, ironically, it generally is) .. "I did this for you -- I gave this up for you .. and yet you are not ENTIRELY mine." ..kind of school girl/boy stuff. ( An agony tale of sufferings, sacrifices etc !! No , I am not trying to make fun of sacrifices and stuff like that; if anything, I am making fun of the 'expectations of reward', or of give and take'. A sacrifice is a glorious divine thing; but a sacrifice that expects a sacrifice in return is nothing more than a deal, no matter how romantically attractive it may seem at first.In reality, its more like a "suicide pact". True, such a sacrifice too involves heavy costs but costs are on both parties, not just one -- which makes it a bargain, rather than love.) If its about adjustments, if its about give and take, for God's sake, call it a give and take,, call it adjustment, however enlightened; don't call it love) .Unfortunately, this 'romantic glorification of give and take lingers beyond schools.....

( What I am talking about here is not one sided love, love unrequited or some other adeolescent stuff like that. That is another form of sucide, even though it is suffered with the holiest intent. This is another zone and we can deal with it separately. But one must be extremely watchhful here because the partition between love in its finest form  and one--sided love is transparent enough to mislead. Perhaps this requires a separate discussion . But let someone start with a comment, please)

Yes, as I said, love is about giving but that's just the start....It goes far, far beyond that, reaches a state of sehaj ---cool acceptance of the other's presence in the way she is, not the way I want her to be. And if possible, to grow together taking everything/everyone else along -- not excluding them, but taking them along. Some of these others may be comfortable going along with one of "the two in love" and so it must be. In love, I must leave her free to build her own private relationships and seek her own fulfillments wherever she can get happiness, knowing all the while l that deep into the depths, invisible but strong roots connect me with her-- roots that are unbreakable. Love is roots, not leaves and branches.Leaves and branches must spread out. They must spread out to fetch more oxygen for the roots. Stay connected at the root. 

All this while, if I am and must be sure of her love -- which, ironically, I wouldn't bother to be if I truly love her. Then I would know that each one of us is on a journey with a shared goal. Oh, sometimes even the goals may differ, but what will still bind us is the love we have for each other and for everything and everyone else in this universe. In the end, I can not be disloyal to the universe, all of which belongs to me because I am of it ( of all of it) -- made of its atoms just as the one I love also is. ( Star stuff seeking stars !!)

......God, I guess I must open a new Dera and make sure that I don't call it premiaan da dera ( Sirsa vaale premi).. Prem Nagar might be somewhere near it.....:):):) Seriously, its a subject as profound as God ( or Universe) is. More of that after I hear the echoes.....

Love marches royally in this masked process


Is love a theoretical equation. Nooops. Its for real; its happening everywhere; its waiting to happen to you, to me, to all of us. Open the doors..zara mann ki kivadiaa khol....Seriosuly, although I know there is enough to discourage one, enough treachery, idifference, selfishness, greed, lust -- all masquerading as love - yet in this masked procession, love marches royally oblivious of all else...Believe me its true. There is more love waiting to happen than you and I can handle.. Just allow it to happen...Allow it to happen - believe in it. You may be wrong once and that may hurt. But the overwhelming presence of love won't go away... it is already taking place, here, everywhere....

the overwhelming presence of love won't go away.



Is love a theoretical equation. Nooops. Its for real; its happening everywhere; its waiting to happen to you, to me, to all of us. Open the doors..zara mann ki kivadiaa khol....Seriosuly, although I know there is enough to discourage one, enough treachery, idifference, selfishness, greed, lust -- all masquerading as love - yet in this masked process, love marches royally oblivious of all else...Believe me its true. There is more love waiting to happen than you and I can handle.. Just allow it to happen...Allow it to happen - believe in it. You may be wrong once and that may hurt. But the overwhelming presence of love won't go away... it is already taking place, here, everywhere....




Sunday, June 17, 2012

Fatherly favours

The only favour I did my father was to love and worship my mother -- and he thought that that was all I needed to do to be called a great son. Once he told me this, " We are both lucky: you have a father who will always stand by you, no matter what you do. And I am lucky that, with a mother like that, you will seldom need me to do that."

stray pick ups from Facebook: sins which only cross can punish

"All I have to do is to ensure that my sins are of a stature which only a Cross can punish."


"All my life, including its heartbreaks and hardships, has been a dream lived to the fullest. At this stage, I have only gratitude to offer to life."


"It hurts me when I see guilt in the eye of my killer. I want him to kill me with a clean conscience."......


"All I seek is benefit of certainty. Let my punishment be worthy of the sins I commit. In exchange, I am willing to extend benefit of doubt to the whole world. It hurts me when I see guilt in the eye of my killer. I want him to kill me with a clean conscience."......


The only favour I did my father was to love and worship my mother -- and he thought that that was all I needed to do to be called a great son. Once he told me this, " We are both lucky: you have a father who will always stand by you, no matter what you do. And I am lucky that, with a mother like that, you will seldom need me to do that."

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Desire is my twin sister

"Desire is my twin sister and I love her. But as sister, she has other interests too, and so have I. We sleep under the same roof but cometh the day, each one of us ventures out into different directions in search of zones that interest each differently. All my life, she has fed me like a good sister with dreams and mirages, and I have repaid her with daily food for her deep stomach. That done, she goes to sleep and I walk the starry nights into dew kissed dawns to sip some manna for a different mate born with us. We have learnt to love that in which we resemble each other and respect that in which we don't . "

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

ਮੈਂ ਹਾਂ ਇਸ਼ਕ਼ - ਖੁਦਾ ਕੀ ਏ ? Main Haan Ishq Khuda ki e? A Punjabi poem


ਮੈਂ ਹਾਂ ਇਸ਼ਕ਼  - ਖੁਦਾ ਕੀ ਏ ?


An incomplete Poem

ਮੈਂ ਹਾਂ ਇਸ਼ਕ਼  - ਖੁਦਾ ਕੀ ਏ ?
ਇਹ ਧਰਮ , ਦੀਨ , ਇਖ੍ਲਾਕ਼ , ਵਫ਼ਾ ,
ਇਹ ਮੈਥੋਂ ਦਸ ਸਿਵਾ ਕੀ ਏ ?

ਮੈਂ ਤੇੜ ਤੜਾਗੀ ਬੰਨ ਤ੍ਰਿੰਜਣਆਂ ਵਿਚ ਨਚੇਂਦਾ ਵਾਂ ,
ਕਛ ਵੰਝਲੀ , ਸਿਰ ਤੇ ਮੋਰ ਪੰਖ , ਮੈਂ ਮਸਤ ਗਵੇੰਦਾ ਵਾਂ ,

ਜਦੋਂ ਚੜੇ ਘਟਾ ਘਨ-ਘੋਰ ਘੋਰ ,
ਮੈਂ ਪੈਲਾਂ ਪਾਂ, ਬਣ ਮੋਰ, ਮੋਰ
ਉਦੋਂ ਪਵੇ ਬਹਿਸ਼ਤੀ ਸ਼ੋਰ ਸ਼ੋਰ ...

ਹੋਰ ਨਾਦ ਅਨਾਹਦ ਦਾ ਕੀ ਏ ?
ਹੋਏ ਬੰਸੀ ਕੀਤੇ ਰਬਾਬ ਹੋਏ
ਇਹ ਮੈਥੋਂ ਦਸ ਸਿਵਾ ਕੀ ਏ ?

ਬਣ ਫੱਕਰ ਦਰ ਦਰ ਉੱਤੇ  ਅਲਖ ਜਗੇੰਦਾ  ਵਾਂ ,
ਛੱਡ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹੀਆਂ , ਫੜ ਠੂਠਾ  ਭੀਖ  ਮੰਗੇੰਦਾ ਵਾਂ
ਕਦੇ ਪੇਹਨ ਬਸੰਤੀ ਚੋਲੇ ਨੱਢੀ ਹੀਰ ਢੂੰਡੇਦਾ ਵਾਂ

ਕੋਈ ਅਲਖ ਨਿਰੰਜਨੀ ਧੁੰਨ ਧੁੰਨ
ਭੰਨ ਦਵੇ ਸਮਾਧੀ ਸੁੰਨ ਸੁੰਨ
ਮੈਂ ਉਚਰਾਂ ਕੁੰਨ ਬੈਕੁੰਨ ਕੁੰਨ

ਹੋਰ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਦਸ  ਅਜ਼ਾਨ ਕੀ ਏ ?
ਤੂ ਹੋਕੇ ਅੰਤਰ ਧਿਆਨ ਸੁਣੇ
ਤਾਂ ਮੈਥੋਂ ਬਿਨ ਕੁਰਾਨ ਕੀ ਏ ?

ਮੈਂ ਚਿੱਲੇ ਚਾੜ ਸੀਨੇ ੜੇ ਜਖ੍ਮ  ਉਗਾਓੰਦਾ ਵਾਂ
ਕਿੱਤੇ ਟੁਕੜੇ ਦਿਲ ੜੇ ਨੀਹਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਚਿਨੋੰਦਾ ਹਾਂ
ਕਦੇ ਜੰਝ  ਤਿਲਕ  ਲਈ ਸਿਰ ਦਾ ਸਾਈਂ ਗਵੋੰਦਾ ਹਾਂ .

ਬਿਨ ਪ੍ਰੇਮ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਨਾ ਮਿਲਦਾ ਜੀ
ਕੋਈ ਮਿੱਤਰ  ਪਿਆਰਾ  ਦਿਲ ਦਾ ਜੀ
ਕਿਤੇ ਰਤੜੇ ਚੋਲੇ ਸਿਲਦਾ ਜੀ ..
     ਬਿਨਾ  ਏਸ  ਪੰਥ ਤੋਂ ਰਾਹ ਕੀ ਏ ?
      ਹੋਏ ਗੁਰੂ ਕਿਤੇ ਜਾਂ ਗਰੰਥ ਹੋਏ
      ਓਹ ਮੈਥੋਂ ਦਸ ਸਿਵਾ ਕੀ ਏ ?

ਜਦੋਂ ਅਗਨ ਤਪੇ ਤਪ ਤਾਓ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਤਵੀ ਬੁਲੋੰਦੀ ਏ
ਤੇ ਤੜਪਦੀ ਤੱਤੀ ਰੇਤ ਮੇਰੇ ਸੀਨੇ ਠੰਡ ਪੋਂਦੀ ਏ
ਨਾ ਲੀਨ   ਅਗਨ  ਸੰਗ ਅਗਨ ਹੋਵਾਂ ਤਾਂ ਤਾਨੇ ਪੋਂਦੀ ਏ

ਜਦੋਂ ਸਿਰ ਤੇ ਹਾੜ ਤਪੇੰਦਾ ਏ
ਜਦੋਂ ਅੰਬਰ ਅੱਗ ਵਰੇੰਦਾ ਏ
ਮੈਨੂ ਭਾਣਾ ਸ਼ੀਤ ਲਗੇੰਦਾ ਏ

    ਮਰ ਜਾਣਾ  ਜੀਵਤਿਆਂ ਕੀ ਏ ?
    ਇਹ  ਅਗਨ ਕੁੰਡ ਹੈ  ਅਮਰ ਕੁੰਡ
    ਪਰ  ਮੈਥੋਂ ਦਸ ਸਿਵਾ ਕੀ ਏ ?

ਕਿਤੇ ਜ਼ਹਿਰ ਪਿਆਲਾ ਪੀ ਕੇ ਕੋਈ ਝੂਮਰ ਪੋਂਦੀ ਏ
ਕੋਈ ਚਿਤਾ ਤੇ ਸੇਜ ਸਜਾ ਕੇ ਰਾਗ ਮਲ੍ਹਾਰ ਪੈ ਗੋੰਦੀ ਏ
ਕੋਈ ਪੇਰੀੰ ਬੇੜੀਆਂ ਬੰਨ ਕੇ ਤ੍ਰਿਖੜੇ ਤਾਲ ਮਿਲੋੰਦੀ ਏ
      ਰਖ ਸੂਲੀ ਤੇ ਕੋਈ ਸੀਸ ਸੀਸ
      ਦਬ ਸੀਨੇ ਅੰਦਰ ਚੀਸ ਚੀਸ
      ਹੋਏ ਪਵੜੀਆਂ ਚੜ ਇਕੀਸ -'ਕੀਸ
ਬਿਨ ਆਪ ਗਵਾਇਆਂ ਰਾਹ ਕੀ ਏ ?
ਜੇ ਜ਼ਹਰ ਪੀਣ ਦਾ ਝੱਲ ਨਹੀਂ
ਤਾਂ ਅਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਦਾ ਮਜ਼ਾ ਕੀ ਏ ?
ਹੋਏ ਜ਼ਹਰ ਕਿਤੇ ਜਾ ਅਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਜਲ
ਇਹ  ਮੈਥੋਂ ਦਸ ਸਿਵਾ ਕੀ ਏ ?   ( ਅਧੂਰੀ )

The poem is incomplete and needs revision too. This is a raw attempt. Obviously -- needs a re-look in terms of balance , rhythm, rhyme -- and reason !!! All Help welcome   --  HB